These days The Gates of Hell is known to people on the internet as City of the Living Dead, although I never saw it on a video store shelf under any title other than The Gates of Hell. But did you know that the Italian title, Paura nella città dei morti viventi, translates directly to “Fear in the City of the Living Dead?” Out of VHS nostalgia, I prefer The Gates of Hell, but Fear in the City of the Living Dead is the most appropriate title. The film is known as a splatter epic, and it is an impressive entry in the gore subgenre, as well as my favorite of Fulci’s Unholy Trilogy, but it’s more than just an showcase of how Fulci and his effects team decided to “kill” people on film. It is a film about fear.
The film opens with a priest committing suicide, but we soon pull back to find that what we are really seeing is the vision of a psychic woman named Mary. In the middle of her vision, Mary dies of fright. However, and without explanation, she is soon resurrected, but not before she is buried. Then, with the help of the journalist who rescues her, a psychiatrist, and one of the psychiatrist’s patients, Mary has to try to stop the end of the world before midnight on All Saints’ Day.
Except that it’s not Mary who ends up saving the world. It’s actually Gerry, the psychiatrist, who destroys the undead priest and causes the walking dead to lie back down. There’s a pivotal scene in the film that often goes overlooked in favor of the drill through the head and the vomiting of guts. Gerry comes face to face with the zombie formerly known as his girlfriend, Emily. But instead of standing there and pissing himself, or screaming, he closes his eyes and takes a deep breath. When he opens his eyes, Emily disappears as if by magic, or stop motion, and Gerry lives to fight until the end of the film. Other than Emily’s little brother, who manages to evade the zombies because little kids can run faster than hell, Gerry is the only person to face off with one of the undead and suffer no effects. Even our heroine, Mary, bleeds from the eyes when the priest looks at her.
If you don’t believe me, you can hear it right from the mouth of Mr. Fulci himself. I’ve noticed that when a director inserts themselves into the film, but only has one or two lines, those lines often make up The Whole Point of the film. In Desert Hearts, for example, director Donna Deitch appears as a gambler who says the line, “If you don’t play, you can’t win.” That’s because Desert Hearts is a film about taking chances, not in the casino, but in relationships. Similarly, Fulci appears in The Gates of Hell as the pathologist who explains Emily’s death, Emily being the first victim they find when the horror begins in the doomed city of Dunwich. The pathologist says she died of fright, so we should listen to him, because he is the director. This is not a film about zombies, it is a film about fear. That’s why it doesn’t matter whether the zombies teleport or shuffle, or whether they stare you down until your eyes bleed or smear worms in your face, because they’re just here to scare the shit out of you.
If I had to write an academic paper about The Gates of Hell, I’d probably expand to say that the priest represents the way that religion controls people through fear, and the psychiatrist defeats him through rational thought. Science! But I’m just one more horror nerd with a blog.
If it sounds like I’m discounting the gore in the film, I’m not. I love the bleeding eyes and the guts, especially because I can tell how the effects were done and therefore appreciate them that much more. As for the drill through the head, if I hadn’t seen the same actor in Stage Fright a few years later, I’d probably think he actually died on film here because that’s how impressive that effect is. I’ve read about how it was done, but I can’t quite wrap my mind around it. It’s just that this is a gore film in which the gore is a means to an end: scaring you. And the gore itself is, in the context of the film, a symptom of the much greater fear that the victims experience. The fact that the film is disgusting, but doesn’t make me feel like someone removed my soul with a grapefruit spoon, is the reason why I keep returning to it, and noticing new things.
I will say this, though: my favorite gore scene is the one that happens mostly in the mind of the viewer. After Emily kills her parents, we are told, instead of shown, that she ripped them apart. Whatever she did to them, it left so much blood on the floor upstairs that it leaks through the ceiling and drips into a glass of milk, drop by drop. Beautiful red swirling in white! I can think of creative ways to “kill” actors, but I could never have come up with the blood dripping into the milk as a way to make you imagine how they must have died. It impressed another filmmaker as well; Jose Ramon Larraz used the same image of the upstairs blood falling into the downstairs milk about eight years later in Edge of the Axe.
mistylayne said:
Religious horror? So in. So long as I can find it. And you should totes do an academic look into this (or others). I just did a critical analysis (kind of, sort of) for Black Swan at Head in a Vice and it was a lot of fun. I’d enjoy reading it if you did one.
Wednesday's Child said:
If I ever actually go to grad school I might write it!
mistylayne said:
You don’t need grad school to write it! You know your stuff especially about these kinds of movies.
Em said:
This is one of the best reviews I’ve read on the film. It’s one of my favorites, and I did go to see it in a theater under the title, The Gates of Hell. Unfortunately, I left right after the intestine-spewing scene. I thought if a film was THAT crazy before it was even half over, I wasn’t ready to handle the rest of what it threw at me. It took a couple/few years before I could summon the courage to watch it on VHS. And I had to have my sisters watch with me.
The film reminded me of a couple of my favorite haunted house films: The Haunting, and The Legend of Hell house. If only for the deliciously creepy sounds and atmosphere to burn (I’m a sucker for fog effects). And how about the just-chiling-enough music? Heck, I plain old LOVE this film.
Wednesday's Child said:
I’m glad you liked the review. I agree about the sounds, that is one of my favorite things about the film. I particularly like the voice? moan? sound that is heard when the fire shoots up out of the vent in the apartment at the beginning when the police are there giving everyone hell because of Mary’s death. And the music is awesome too. By the way, The Haunting of Hell House has some of my favorite fog effects of all time.
Em said:
Ha. The fireball scene got to me. It’s such a simple effect, but the sounds put it waaaay over the top. THAT scene made me stop the tape and cancel watching the video until my sisters were able to watch with me. It was only my second Fulci film, if that tells you anything (though I should have known, having seen Zombie in a theater, first).
Wednesday's Child said:
I think it was the second one I saw too, after The House By The Cemetery.
MikesFilmTalk said:
Great post and another gem of a film to find and watch. Cheers mate!!
Wednesday's Child said:
Thanks!
MikesFilmTalk said:
brandon early (@MoviesAtDogFarm) said:
What an excellent article, and so very astute. It’s easy with Fulci to enjoy the gorey gravy so much that you miss the taters underneath. I think Fulci was a much smarter director than he’s usually given credit for. Don’t Torture A Duckling (I know – that title – it’s unfortunate) is some great Fulci if you’ve never seen it.
Gates Of Hell was actually the first Fulci movie I ever saw, and I also first came to know of it by that title. It’s one of those happy childhood memories of the Skyline Drive-In I wrote about. I’ve always enjoyed the tough, visceral nature of the latter day horror films that he’s primarily known for, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised by his other work, as well (like Duckling). Lizard In A Woman’s Skin is also an interesting watch.
I love that he seemed to be so cantankerous. He never missed an opportunity to chide Wes Craven about appropriating the “original” idea for New Nightmare from his own Cat In The Brain. I don’t know if that’s actually true (I’m not sure if Craven was aware of Cat In The Brain), but it’s a great anecdote.
mistylayne is right on the money. You really should do an even deeper academic exploration. Great post.
Wednesday's Child said:
You know, the funny thing is that A Cat in the Brain is just a horror version of 8 1/2, and between 8 1/2 and A Cat in the Brain Woody Allen did his version of 8 1/2 with Stardust Memories, so it’s hard to say who is ripping off whom! Thanks for your compliments re: this article.
sarafist said:
I love that this is your favorite of the Gates of Hell trilogy; it’s mine, too, but I’ve been chided for it a lot recently. Fools!
I thoroughly enjoyed your assessment, too. I think a number of viewers overlook those (comparatively) subtle cues about what Fulci was after here in favor of the gore and setpieces.
billermo said:
Chides.
Wednesday's Child said:
Yes, there are a lot of people who think Fulci was a hack, with a lot of criticism being directed towards this film in particular. (Those people should go and watch Hell of the Living Dead to see how much worse the Italian zombie film can get!) I think it’s the ending of The Gates of Hell that bothers people the most. The fact that Fulci basically said “the film tore, and we thought it looked cool, so we left it in” doesn’t help in the argument about style over substance. Anyway, I’m glad to know I’m not the only one who likes this one best!
angryscholar said:
Great review.
I’m generally not a huge fan of gory horror, but two things made me consider watching this. First: “The fact that the film is disgusting, but doesn’t make me feel like someone removed my soul with a grapefruit spoon, is the reason why I keep returning to it, and noticing new things.” Well said. That speaks volumes about the use of violence here.
Second, Em’s comparison of “Gates of Hell” to “The Haunting” and “The Legend of Hell House.” The former is one of my favorite films of all time, and while I wasn’t a huge fan of Hell House, I’m very interested to see it mentioned in connection to a Fulci film.
Wednesday's Child said:
I’m not the biggest gore fan either. I don’t mind the comedic ones like Vampire Girl Vs Frankenstein Girl, and I love the ones like this one that combine gore and the supernatural. It’s the bleak, hyper-realistic ones I can’t enjoy.
I can’t speak for Em, but I think she’s comparing those films to The Gates of Hell because the main character here is a psychic, and the zombies have some ghost-like qualities. However, The Gates of Hell, in true Fulci form, does not possess much subtlety, so there’s no comparison to The Haunting in that respect! But for a Fulci film, there is a relatively traditional narrative here, and best of all, there’s an explanation for why the dead are walking.
angryscholar said:
Sweet, I’m sold. I’ll try to find it someplace. Thanks for the review–keep up the great work!
Wednesday's Child said:
Thank you!
billermo said:
I’ve taken to calling it CotLD in recent years, mostly since that’s what my DVD of it was titled, but I still have it as Gates on VHS, which is how I first saw it way back in the ’80s. I like that title better, too.
Though, I prefer The Beyond and The House by the Cemetery to Gates, I do still love it and you’re spot on with everything you’ve said here. Good piece.
Wednesday's Child said:
I wonder why it was re-titled for the DVD? I know most people prefer The Beyond, and I like that one too, but this one is my jam. Maybe it has to do with the presence of Christopher George. Anyway, I’m glad you liked this article.
Brian said:
This is a remarkably well-written review. By the way, the guy in the drill scene was killed, that was his similarly named twin brother in Stage Fright.
Wednesday's Child said:
I knew it!
theipc said:
So… not a grapefruit spoon… any other type of utensil??
Wednesday's Child said:
A Slap Chop!
Pingback: Ultimate Gore-a-thon: A Splatterific Extravaganza | Blood Sucking Geek
James said:
Absolutely brilliant review! I always find your stuff very refreshing, and I think I’ll add this to my collection of things to watch.
Wednesday's Child said:
Hey, how have you been? Thanks for commenting, and if you haven’t seen this one you are in for a treat. It’s an A list B movie!
deathstalker2 said:
You could also say that the ending is a treatise on the terrors of unwanted pregnancy, or being forced to take care of some rando kid.
Wednesday's Child said:
Yeah, it doesn’t escape most viewers that she screams when she sees that kid running towards her. I’ve always thought that if the ending had a meaning, it was that the whole film was part of her vision from the beginning, or she’s caught in a loop…whatever has happened, in her mind she is back at the beginning, screaming, and is going to have to relive it all. And man, that woman can scream!
deathstalker2 said:
lmao! I heard the real reason behind the ending is that they were supposed to show the kid was a zombie but it got screwed up somehow, like they ran out of money and said “fuck it”.