Tags
Ben Cross, Bernard Rose, Catherne Storr, Charlotte Burke, Elliott Spiers, Gemma Jones, Glenne Headly, Matthew Jacobs
On her 11th birthday, Anna (Charlotte Burke) begins to suffer at school from repeated bouts of unconsciousness which turn out to be the effect of mono (called “glandular fever” in the movie). In her dreaming/ unconscious state, a house which she had drawn becomes real. In the house she finds a boy named Marc (Elliott Spiers) who exists in real life and who also is a patient of Anna’s doctor (Gemma Jones), although he and Anna have never met. The dream world is at first just surreal, which is creepy enough; however, after Anna angrily marks out and then crumples the drawing, the dream becomes frightening, and soon, as she convalesces at home and her fever worsens, she finds herself unable to wake. Her father (Ben Cross), absent in her waking life, becomes a monster in her dream, and finally the dream is able to affect real life in the same way that Anna’s drawings were able to affect the dream world. And for double the fun, our old friend, horror movie ambiguity, strikes again at the end.
Paperhouse is a mix of horror, fantasy, and art, with metaphors that are easy to see but no less effective for their obviousness. The film deals with the fear that a child deals with during a grave illness and the anger she feels because her father is away on business most of the time. Also, the dream world and its terrors symbolize the age when a child begins to have fluctuating hormones which cause mood swings and confusion. Anna is not a child anymore completely, yet she isn’t fully into puberty either, and her best friend at school (Sarah Newbold) is maturing more quickly. It is an uneasy time in most people’s lives, not only for the child but for the parents, and Glenne Headly as Anna’s mom sells her role as the stressed out parent dealing with Anna alone. Anna’s school is an overcrowded, dingy place, so one can understand her need to draw herself away from it, and I felt myself transported by the film to that time in my life, i.e. middle school, when school and home seemed equally unappealing.
Heck, this film could be even more symbolic, for all I know; perhaps it is a comment on the defacto breakup of families due to job scarcity at the time in London. Was that an issue in the UK of 1988? Certainly the dad’s trouble with alcohol is alluded to. It could even be a retort against film censorship of the time in the form of an extremely dark picture free from violence or sex. A video nice-ty, if you will.
I can remember when Paperhouse was on the shelves at every video store. Now it has become a somewhat rare film in the US. I believe it suffered from inaccurate marketing from the video distribution company: the box had a blurb comparing Paperhouse to Nightmare on Elm Street, which is a very inaccurate comparison aside from the fact that both movies deal with dreams that become too real. However, Paperhouse, although not as frightening as NOES, in some ways is a deeper film. It is also a rare horror film in that it not only focuses on children, but it also seems to be directed at them. It is much closer to The Gate than to NOES.
Glenne Headly and Gemma Jones are great as always, and Ben Cross elevates any movie that he is in, but the two child actors, Burke and Spiers, do carry the film. The casting of Burke is particularly effective in my opinion because she looks and acts like an average, awkward pre-teen rather than a precious, precocious movie darling. It is unfortunate that Paperhouse was her only film. But the real star here is Spiers, who brings a poignancy to the sickly and sensitive Marc. Watching him now seems even more raw knowing that he committed suicide in 1994, and it is sad that what might have been a fine acting career was cut so short. Still, if these two were only to be remembered for one film, this is a worthy one to be remembered for.
mistylayne said:
This sounds amazing!
Wednesday's Child said:
Yes, let me know what you think if you watch it.
jpthorn said:
I love the mis-marketing this film got…hahahaha!
Wednesday's Child said:
I always hated those lame comparisons…remember in the 90s, every crime movie you’d never heard of had a comparison to Pulp Fiction on the box?
jmount43 said:
Sounds like one to check out. Love your review.
Wednesday's Child said:
Thank you! Yes, I highly recommend this one, and I wish it would get a proper US DVD release!
jmount43 said:
Hopefully soon!
Tony Cowin (@TonyCowin) said:
Loved this when I was younger. I had glandular fever at that age and I still remember some of the strange things I saw and experienced due to the high fever. Yes unemployment was a huge issue in the UK in the 1980′s. I recall this being a TV series first (or something very) though. Not sure if it was called Paperhouse though. Will look it up.
Started watching with my 10 year old daughter last year and had to stop as she became too scared. Kids these days lol.
Tony Cowin (@TonyCowin) said:
Began to think I’d also dreamt that TV series too. Found it though. It’s called ‘Escape Into Night’ (1972). The BBC destroyed the colour master tapes so this is a recovered B&W version.
http://www.networkdvd.net/product_info.php?products_id=858&language=
Wednesday's Child said:
Yeah, I never know what’s going to scare my son. Heh. He can’t quite handle Gremlins yet at age eight, for example, when I remember that as having been something every kid watched in the 80s. But I can understand being scared of the dad character in Paperhouse, especially during the part where Anna falls asleep in the bathtub and sees him on the beach. Thanks for the info on and link to the TV series; how strange about the color! I’m eventually going to watch that too.
catalinmesaru said:
I absolutely LOVE this movie. Very haunting and visually stunning.
Wednesday's Child said:
I’m glad to know Paperhouse has so many fans!
E.F. Contentment (@EFContentment) said:
NOES comparison is just a cheap way to get people to rent it. Some end up taking it home and are met with a deeper, different film but that doesn’t matter because Freddy ain’t slashing dudes up, so they end up blaming the film for sucking (read: not being the film they thought it would be). Distributors can hurt a film when they pull that. Doesn’t matter how much I like Diet Coke — you hand me a cup and tell me it’s Dr. Pepper, I’m gonna be unpleasantly surprised when I take that first sip.
I bought the VHS at a going-out-of-business sale, just because it was from the same guy who made Candyman and Immortal Beloved. I was not disappointed.
Wednesday's Child said:
I really need to check out Immortal Beloved sometime. Ya know, these days the way distributors try to fool people is with the actual title of the film being similar. Paranormal Entity, etc. So if they wanted someone to rent a movie based on liking NOES they’d call it Sleep Paralysis on Maple Avenue, then another company would come out with Bad Dreams on a Cul De Sac, and then Roger Corman could do the Sci-Fi TV version as Old Hag Versus Carl Jung. The thing is, there is no excuse for falling for that trick, unlike with a review on a box.